Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(31)
Seeliger, H.P.R. & Jones, D. in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology Vol. 2 1235–1245 (Williams & Wilkins, 1986).
The identifications were confirmed by using the Bergey's Manual of systematic bacteriology (Aneja 1999).
The strain identification, based on morphological characteristics, was made according to Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology (Lechevalier 1989).
Physiological and biochemical tests were performed as described in Bergey's manual of systematic bacteriology (Holt et al. 2000).
Standard procedures described in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology (Alsina and Blanch 1994) were used for the species identification.
The Bacillus species were identified based on methods described in Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [11],[11].
Similar(29)
An electronic literature search of MEDLINE and PubMed from 01/01/2004 to 01/06/2013 with no language restriction and manual screening of reference lists of systematic reviews on similar topics and all included papers.
They utilized Medline, the Cochrane database of systematic reviews and a manual search of bibliographies for this review.
Classification of bacteria is determined by publication in the International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology, and Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology.
All five tests that required no manual fixation had acceptable reliability (ICC >.60 and no indication of systematic error).
A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline, Psychinfo, Embase, the Cochrane Library of systematic reviews, and the NIVEL-catalogue, supplemented with manual searches of references.
More suggestions(1)
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com