The phrase "manual method with" is correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe a process or task that is done by hand instead of with a machine or technology. Example: "The antique clock was repaired using a manual method with delicate tools and skilled craftsmanship."
A total of 9806 breaths were analyzed with the manual method, with a median of 168 (IQR: 123 258) breaths analyzed per recording.
Our studies showed that the automated algorithm performed as good as the tedious and laborious manual method with the calculated average corneal temperature of 34.01±0.64°C (automated) and 33.99±0.63°C for manual method.
The statistical results also reveal that the combination method corresponds more closely to manual method with increasing resolution.
However, the precision of the automated method was better than that of the manual method with SDs of less than or equal to those of the manual method.
In addition, we have shown that low-dose CT yields more accurate nodule volume measurements when using a semi-automated method than in the case of the manual method, with negligible underestimation of actual size, especially for small nodules.
The proposed procedure minimizes the main drawbacks related to the standard chromatographic procedure and to flow analysis and manual methods with spectrophotometric detection based on the reaction with sodium dithionite, i.e. high solvent consumption and waste generation and low sampling rate for chromatography and high instability of the reagent in the spectrophotometric procedures.
This protocol of automated array-CGH on archival FFPE ULS-labeled DNA outperformed all our manual methods with respect to accuracy, reproducibility, easy of handling, and speed.
Results for two initialization approaches are comparable to the manual method, and with a performance slightly lower than the automatic estimation method.
However, the automatic control system showed a faster response time than the manual method only with large increasing steps (e.g. 149 (32) s and 205 (57) s respectively for +0.6 vol% step changes) and was not different from manual control for decreasing steps.
For solid nodules, the underestimation was 10.1 ± 6.9 % using the manual method, compared with 3.7 ± 7.1 % (P < 0.01) using the semi-automated method.
Uncertainty analysis of the manual method was compared with the automated system.
