Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(16)
In addition, it directly contradicts other research on visual and manual distraction that has found that drivers who use integrated hands-free technology are not at increased risk.
There are three types of distraction: manual distraction, which takes hands off the wheel; visual distraction, which pulls eyes from the road; and cognitive distraction, which take minds off the driving task.
After 14 weeks, seven of eight experimental specimens (chips with viable chondrocytes) demonstrated bridging of the incision assessed by gross inspection and manual distraction.
The purpose of this paper was to investigate how individual differences in glance strategy could impact the glance performance test defined in the NHTSA visual manual distraction guidelines.
There may be a case made for pediatric patients who may show anxiety over use of wrenches on manual distraction struts and for those select adult patients where compliance is a concern.
Manual distraction (0.25 mm four times a day) in a group containing 43 tibiae was compared with motorized distraction (1/1,440 mm 1,400 times a day) in a group containing 27 tibiae.
Similar(44)
In contrast to the AAA study, their findings suggest that any danger of using technology while driving is due primarily to visual and manual distractions.
Doctors of chiropractic commonly use manual cervical distraction, a mobilization procedure, to treat neck pain patients.
However, Welch et al. [4] reported no difference between manual and motorized distraction in goats.
The purpose of this study was to analyse the changes in histologic peroneal nerve structure during experimental orthopaedic lengthening using various modes of manual or automatic distraction.
Most existing research, including studies sponsored by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, suggests that manual and visual distractions are by far the most dangerous of the three.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com