A drawback, however, is that the difficulty of finding or generating a set of suitable images that allowed all of the manipulation types to be applied reduced the total number of photos that could be tested to some degree.
One possible solution to generalize the manipulation of all moment types is the use of an evolutionary optimization procedure to search for optimal quantization steps for each moment coefficient.
Manipulation of VGSCs in particular cell types is desirable for many of these indications, as global channel blocking is likely to have deleterious consequences.
Experiments 1 and 2 found that levels of false recognition with both list types were increased by manipulations that facilitated the generation of associates at study (blocked presentation of study lists and explicit instructions to generate associates of studied items).
We used a within-subjects design in which each person viewed a series of ten photos, half of which had one of five manipulation types applied, and half of which were original, non-manipulated photos.
Across both physically implausible and physically plausible manipulation types, subjects often correctly indicated that photos were manipulated but failed to then accurately locate the manipulation.
Collapsing over all manipulation types, a mean 45% of the manipulations were accurately located, 95%CI[4343%, 46%].
We also explored whether manipulation type and individual differences were associated with people's ability to identify manipulations.
The manipulation type "Overall" is the mean number of manipulated regions across all six images and all five manipulation types.
The change type manipulation was not significant in the change discrimination task, suggesting that the manner in which a change is induced does not affect the perception of that change.
