Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(10)
The data source for this study was the MarketScan database, a national managed care claims dataset.
We retrospectively analyzed medical claims in large U.S. managed care claims databases (Thomson Reuters MarketScan®, 16 million lives).
Second, the IHCIS database consists of managed care claims only and is therefore representative of an employer-based, commercially insured population.
This was a retrospective claims data analysis using medical and pharmacy data, enrollment information, and laboratory results obtained from a large US managed care claims database.
This study was limited by the data available in a managed care claims database, given that claims data are collected for payment and not for research.
A retrospective, observational study was conducted, using a large managed care claims database that comprised of patients with type 2 diabetes initiating exenatide or glargine treatment.
Similar(50)
This could lead to a lower PPV compared to our study and the study by Movig et al. In addition, managed-care claims databases encompass an employer-based commercially insured population.
In the USA, the prevalence of gout in a managed-care administrative claims database increased from 2.9/1,000 in 1990 to 5.2/1,000 in 1999 [ 7], most notably in men aged over 75 years.
"Without a doubt, an increasing amount of claims from providers are going to collections," said Robert Perez, senior vice president of RevCare, which manages health care claims.
This large, retrospective, cross-sectional analysis of US managed care administrative claims data describes a practical method to identify COPD patients using claims data.
Both the current study and one using very similar methods (1 inpatient or 2 outpatient claims for PM, DM, or interstitial myositis) in another U.S. managed care administrative claims database [ 19] reported notably higher incidence of IIMs than the 0.1 to 1 per 100,000 py reported in community-based studies using smaller populations [ 2, 10- 15].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com