manage for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "manage for" is not correct and should not be used in written English.
To use the phrase appropriately, you would need to change it to something like "manage for [purpose]". For example, you could say "She's managing the project for success".

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

We suggest that parks and reserves consider implementing human resource management policies that actively manage for uncertainty.

Environmental Management

She warned against wildlife managers using previous patterns to manage for the future.

The New York Times

We recommend that managers ban the all-encompassing norms and manage for heterogeneity at different scales.

Forest Ecology and Management

Assets Under Management Fee: Based on a percentage of assets they manage for you.

Forbes

"I manage for the future.

The New York Times - Arts

He could manage for a little while.

The Economist

I didn't manage for profit.

The New York Times

"We manage for market share that's sustainably profitable".

The New York Times - Tech

After all, didn't people manage for centuries with sheep intestines?

The Guardian - Arts

You try to keep track; you manage, for a while.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

I wrote my thesis at Wharton on how to manage for-profit schools.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "manage for", ensure the context clearly implies a specific goal or purpose. While common, clarify with additional words to avoid ambiguity. For example: "manage the project for success".

Common error

Avoid using "manage for" without a clearly defined objective. Saying "we manage for results" is vague. Instead, specify "we manage for profitable results" to provide a clear direction.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "manage for" functions as a verb phrase indicating the act of managing something with a specific intention or purpose. Despite its common use, Ludwig AI indicates that it is not correct and requires context to ensure clarity. For example, from Ludwig's examples, wildlife managers "manage for" the future.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

39%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

17%

Less common in

Academia

4%

Wiki

4%

Reference

3%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "manage for" is a frequently used verb phrase that aims to convey the idea of directing management efforts toward a specific goal. However, as Ludwig AI points out, the phrase is grammatically questionable and requires clear context for effective communication. While prevalent across diverse sources like news, science, and business, alternative phrases such as "optimize for" or "manage towards" can enhance clarity. To avoid ambiguity, it's best to specify the intended outcome, like "manage the project for success".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

optimize for

Focuses on achieving the best possible outcome or result for a specific purpose.

manage towards

Emphasizes the direction or goal of the management efforts, shifting the focus slightly from the immediate object being managed.

strategize for

Shifts the focus to the strategic planning aspect of management, implying a long-term perspective.

handle in order to

Replaces "manage" with "handle" and clarifies the purpose with "in order to,", adding explicitness.

oversee with the aim of

Emphasizes a supervisory role and specifies the intention behind the oversight.

regulate to ensure

Focuses on the regulatory aspect of management, emphasizing the goal of ensuring a specific outcome.

conduct in order to

Replaces manage with conduct, clarifying the reason with in order to, which adds explicitness.

administer to achieve

More formal and emphasizes the process of administration with a focus on reaching a desired outcome.

plan for the sake of

Highlights the planning aspect and clarifies that it is done for a specific reason or benefit.

organize with the purpose of

Emphasizes the organizational aspect and clearly states the reason for the organization.

FAQs

What does "manage for" mean?

The phrase "manage for" typically implies directing resources and efforts towards achieving a particular goal or outcome. It suggests a proactive approach to guide something toward a specific result.

Is "manage for" grammatically correct?

While commonly used, "manage for" is considered grammatically questionable by some. It often requires additional context to be fully clear, such as "manage the process for efficiency."

How can I rephrase "manage for" to sound more precise?

Consider alternatives like "optimize for", "manage towards", or specify your goal with a phrase like "manage in order to achieve [goal]" for greater clarity.

What is a better way to use "manage for" in a sentence?

Instead of saying "we manage for growth", try "we manage the company for sustainable growth" to be more explicit about the intended outcome.