Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(15)
These neonatal problems remained significant even when medical or pathologic causes of intrauterine growth failure, including pregnancy hypertension, multiple gestation, and congenital malformations, were excluded.
Neonates with major congenital malformations were excluded.
Infants with major congenital malformations were excluded.
Newborns with any congenital malformations were excluded.
When infants with congenital malformations were excluded, they reported no perinatal deaths in their material.
Patients with karyotypic abnormalities, Fragile X syndrome or other genetic syndromes causing congenital malformations were excluded.
Similar(45)
But the risk in first Caesarean deliveries persisted even when deaths from congenital malformation were excluded from the calculation.
For the analyses of the pregnancy outcome measures: birth weight and gestational age, non-Caucasians, twin pregnancies and pregnancies that resulted in the birth of a child with a malformation were excluded, resulting in 184 patients to be studied.
Children born in multiple pregnancies (n=14 533) and children with congenital malformations (n=17 766) were excluded from the study.
Severely ill mothers, preterm deliveries and congenital malformation babies were excluded from the study.
Children with anogenital malformations, which prevented identification of anatomical landmarks for measuring AGD, and in whom genital anomalies were a part of a malformation syndrome, were excluded.
More suggestions(15)
malformations were examined
malformations were analyzed
malformations were reported
malformations were detected
malformations were exposed
malformations were observed
malformations were defined
malformations were identified
malformations were registered
malformations were diagnosed
malformations were recorded
malformations were assessed
malformations were analysed
malformations were classified
malformations were monitored
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com