Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(2)
The pupa malformations were estimated to be 6.7, 13.4, and 3.4% for treated larvaes with SiO2-TX, SiO2-CTAB, and SiO2-PVP, respectively.
For each SSRI, ORs for major congenital malformations were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models for women exposed to an SSRI during the first trimester and for women with paused exposure during pregnancy.
Similar(58)
Intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) are estimated to have a prevalence of 1.4 4.3%. 1 Intracranial haemorrhage and epilepsy are the main clinical presentations in patients with AVMs.
Congenital heart defects (CHD) represent the most common inborn malformation and are estimated as a major cause for prenatal birth losses.
Cerebral cavernous malformation lesions are estimated to occur in 0.3 0.5% of the general population (Cavalcanti et al, 2012) and can either remain clinically silent or cause serious clinical symptoms, such as headaches, neurological deficits, seizures, strokes, and intracerebral hemorrhages (Gault et al, 2004; Batra et al, 2009).
3 Genetic factors play a significant role in the development of skeletal malformations which have been estimated to account for 70% 80% of the variance in bone density (BMD), and also 25%35%% risk for bone fractures.
More than one malformation per newborn was included, and the organ-group specific prevalence was estimated in each exposure group.
The incidence of calcification in cavernous malformations is higher, estimated to be around 40 60 % of cases, often with the typical "popcorn-ball" appearance [40].
Congenital malformations were the leading cause of neonatal death regardless of the type of delivery.
Specifically, the presence of congenital malformations of the genital organs, congenital malformations of the urinary system, congenital malformations and deformities of the musculoskeletal system and other congenital malformations were evaluated [29].
The most common cardiac malformations were septal defects.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com