Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(23)
split hand/split foot malformation type 1. tobacco etch virus.
Chiari malformation, Type 1, with syringomyelia (CIM+SM) is often associated with spinal deformity.
The vast majority of these patients present with a Chiari malformation type I.
Intraspinal abnormalities such as Arnold-Chiari malformation type I, syringomyelia, diastematomyelia or tethered cord may be associated.
The symptoms in Chiari malformation type I (CM-I) have different presentations, and depends on certain malformation components.
Richard et al. [2] reported that proportion of ELS with frequently associated congenital cystic adenomatoid malformation type II was approximately 50%.
Similar(37)
There were 175 extrarenal malformations recorded in these cases consisting of 80 different malformation types.
These syndromes are: the ectodermal dysplasia ectrodactyly cleft palate (EEC, MIM #129900), the ankyloblepharon ectodermal dysplasia clefting (AEC, MIM #106260), the limb mammary syndrome (LMS, MIM #603543), the acro dermato ungual lacrimal tooth (ADULT, MIM #103285) and non-syndromic split-hand/foot malformation type-4 (SHFM-IV, MIM #605289) (1– 4).
It is characterized by congenital aplasia of the uterus and the upper two-thirds of the vagina in women with a normal female karyotype and secondary sexual characteristics [ 1], and it may occur as isolated (type I) or associated with renal, skeletal, hearing, and cardiac malformations (type II) [ 2].
The limb defects observed in p63−/− mice are highly reminiscent of ectrodactily found in patients affected by the Ectrodactily-Ectodermal Dysplasia-Cleft palate syndrome (EEC) or in non-syndromic Ectrodactily, also known as Split-Hand Foot Malformation (SHFM) type-IV.
It is necessary that professionals, especially primary care physicians, learn to identify the most characteristic symptoms of the most frequent craniocervical malformations (Chiari type I and syringomyelia) in order to develop a diagnostic suspicion and refer appropriately patients for diagnostic confirmation.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com