males with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "males with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to individuals of the male gender in a specific context, often in discussions about demographics, biology, or social issues. Example: "The study focused on males with a higher risk of developing heart disease."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

– but to young males with soft bellies and phantom abs.

The Guardian - Opinion

I was thinking about those males with the Roman noses.

The Guardian - Travel

— Males with longer, heavier feathers don't shake them more slowly, as might be expected, but faster.

The New York Times - Science

McElligott studies vocal communication in fallow deer, where the females prefer males with deep calls.

The Guardian

Each advance results in males with longer, spikier penises, and the coevolutionary arms race continues.

The New Yorker

In particular, young males with limited economic prospects may be susceptible to radicalisation".

The Guardian

Back then, England supporters in particular tended to be young single males with a pack mentality.

The Guardian - Sport

In spite of Zimmerman, according to neighbors, being fixated on bracketing young black males with criminality.

The Guardian - Opinion

The greatest employment losses, he said, are for young males with little or no college.

The New York Times

Grooms are not the only males with pre-wedding vanity.

The New York Times

The effects were negligible on males with uncommon names.

The New York Times - Books

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "males with", ensure the context is appropriate for a formal or scientific setting. In more casual contexts, consider using "men who have" or a similar alternative.

Common error

Avoid using "males with" in informal writing or conversation. It can sound stilted or overly clinical. Opt for more natural alternatives like "men with" or "guys who have" in less formal settings.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "males with" primarily functions as a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun by specifying a characteristic, condition, or attribute associated with individuals of the male sex. Ludwig AI shows a vast amount of real-world examples, suggesting that it is correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

48%

News & Media

43%

Formal & Business

9%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "males with" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase, commonly used to describe subgroups within the male population based on shared attributes. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent usage in both scientific and journalistic contexts. While versatile, it is best suited for formal or scientific writing. For casual communication consider using "men who have" or other similar alternatives. The phrase finds its prevalence in scientific research, news reporting, and formal business correspondence, making it a functional tool in various professional fields. Be mindful to tailor your language according to audience to avoid sounding too clinical. The high quality and large quantity of Ludwig's examples showcase its broad applicability and proper usage.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

men who have

Replaces "males" with "men" and restructures the phrase to use a relative clause. This alters the grammatical structure while retaining the core meaning.

male individuals with

Substitutes "males" with the more formal "male individuals", emphasizing a specific group.

boys with

Replaces "males" with "boys", specifying younger individuals.

men showing

Replaces "with" indicating possession of a characteristic or trait with "showing", which emphasizes display of a feature.

male subjects having

Uses "male subjects" for "males" and replaces "with" with "having" making the sentence sound more formal and scientific.

males possessing

Substitutes "with" with the more formal term "possessing", indicating ownership or inherent qualities.

men characterized by

Replaces the direct association of "with" with a more descriptive "characterized by", changing the sentence structure.

males affected by

Uses "affected by" to specify a condition or influence acting upon the males, narrowing the context.

men identified with

Replaces "with" with "identified with", implying an association or connection rather than a direct attribute.

males displaying

Substitutes "with" to "displaying" which indicates that males are exhibiting a trait that is noticeable.

FAQs

What is a more casual alternative to "males with"?

In informal settings, you can use phrases like "men who have" or "guys with" depending on the context.

When is it appropriate to use "males with"?

"Males with" is most appropriate in formal, scientific, or technical writing where precision is important. It's common in research papers, medical reports, and statistical analyses.

Is there a difference between "males with" and "men with"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct, "males with" is generally perceived as more formal and clinical, whereas "men with" is more commonly used in everyday language.

How can I rephrase sentences using "males with" to sound more natural?

You can rephrase by using relative clauses, such as "men who have" or by simply rephrasing to focus on the characteristic itself, for instance, instead of "males with eating disorders", consider "men experiencing eating disorders".