Ai Feedback
Exact(16)
Additional post hoc analyses examined sex differences in brain responses to non-SCs to determine whether females and males differed in brain responses to visual cues, in general.
In an attempt to shed light on potential mechanisms underlying the impact of sex on brain responses to SCs, additional exploratory post hoc analyses examined sex differences in brain responses to non-SCs to determine whether females and males differed in brain responses to visual cues in general.
We found significant additive genetic variance on embryo survival, i.e. males differed in their genetic quality.
However, chosen males differed in absolute throat colour, but not throat colour rank.
In this experiment, the compartments of the two T. moori "Moliro" stimulus males differed in size.
We found again significant sire effects on embryo survival (Table 2), i.e. the males differed in genetic quality.
Similar(44)
Similarly, given that embryos sired by different males differ in their development rates [39], [40], periods of peak oxygen demand could be slightly offset through time in high diversity clutches.
However, it was shown that males differ in the performance of these song structures, and that performance differences are related to male traits reflecting quality [ 37, 40, 69].
In the argonaut and the blanket octopus (Tremoctopus) the males differ in appearance and size from the females.
Males differ in appearance from the Blue-tailed Emerald by having a mostly red lower bill, but females look almost identical to female Blue-tailed Emeralds in the field.
We tested whether males differ in their propensity to adopt perching or patrolling behaviour by recording time spent flying during 30 min when alone in a large cage with only one large sunspot and many smaller ones, and whether subdominant males adopt a patrolling strategy by allowing dyads of males to interact in the cage for 60 min and recording the same behaviours again.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com