Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
Exact(40)
Testing showed that 18 months after vaccination, children aged five to 17 months had a 46% reduction in the risk of clinical malaria compared to unvaccinated contemporaries.
Chlorproguanil-dapsone provided little protection against clinical malaria compared to placebo.
Cases had a higher prevalence of stunting, wasting and malaria compared to controls.
In this case-control study, Thursz et al. showed that HBV virus carriage was significantly increased amongst cases of severe malaria compared to matched controls.
s-endoglin was found to be increased in Gabonese children with severe malaria compared to UM [18], but we did not replicate these results.
A recent Kenyan study also identified anti-MSP3 IgG responses as being strongly associated with protection, but this again concerned a population with distinctly different exposure to malaria compared to our own cohort [35].
Similar(20)
We did not observe any significant differences in parasitemia, hemoglobin and hematocrit levels of P. falciparum malaria patients across the different B19V genotypes 1 and 2. However, genotype 2 was detected significantly more often in children with severe-malaria compared to children with mild-malaria (P<0.05).
In contrast, there was a trend for IgG1 and IgG3 anti-AMA1 levels to be higher in children with malaria attacks compared to children without clinical malaria attacks.
However, B19V-genotype 2 was more significantly detected in patients with severe malaria (7/16) compared to patients with mild malaria (1/12).
Indeed, a moderate increase was found in the Th1 cytokine interferon-γ response in the intervillous blood mononuclear cell responses of HIV-positive mothers with malaria as compared to HIV-positive mothers without malaria (43 ).
Indeed, based on the Bayesian probabilities, we established that during presumptive diagnosis of malaria, the probability of a correct diagnosis and confirmation of malaria as compared to the laboratory test was generally low.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com