Your English writing platform
Free sign upSuggestions(1)
Exact(2)
By making use of the definition (2.1), we now derive the following result.
(22) and (23) and making use of the definition in Eq. (21) yields From this expression, it is clear that the axial position shift created by the DODL leads only to a constant (wavenumber-independent) phase shift in the photocurrent signal that does not produce any separation between ZPD and DC.
Similar(58)
where we made use of the definition (28) and K ( 0 ) is a suitable integration constant.
For this purpose, we will make use of the definition of Frechet derivatives and we recall Lemma 3.2 of [5] here.
Our answer makes use of the definition of oscillation given at the end of Section 5.1: The solutions of equation (61), the Chebyshev polynomials, are defined in the closed interval ([-1, 1]); therefore, the lowest-order solution that can be called oscillatory according to our definition is the (n=3) polynomial.
Here we have made use of the definitions of,,, in (1.9), (1.11) and.
And satisfies being a constant; here we have made use of the definitions of in (1.5), (1.7), and.
On making use of the series definition (1.5), the above expression becomes.
The latter states that for a given pair of random variables, namely X and Y, variable X has a causal influence on Y if a manipulation of the values of X leads to a change in the probability distribution of Y. Making use of the aforementioned definition of causation, it can be easily observed that each defined variable C L j i has a causal influence on every following variable C L j i + 1, ∀ j.
Making use of the correct definition of Δ z D, this equation can be re-expressed as where k c is the instantaneous central wavenumber, z φn is the phase pathlength corresponding to the nth sample reflector, z φ-r0 is the phase pathlength of the reference reflector at the central wavelength, and M is the slope of the wavelength-dependent reference phase pathlength (in mm/nm).
Here we make use of the following definition, which is a modification of the one given in [5], and is equivalent to the classical one, but it is more suitable for some applications to difference equations, see [6].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com