But the nature of the economic crisis has intensified the implosion of democratic legitimacy within nation states and made the consequent contradictions particularly acute.
A strict conditional is true when all the (accessible) possible worlds where the antecedent is true also make the consequent true.
But in addition, because of the "familiarity" condition induced by the anaphoric definite 'it', there must be a donkey in s2 that is also in s1 and that makes the consequent true.
For example (simplifying a bit), the conditional DRS in figure 4 is true (in a given model) if every assignment with domain {x, y} that makes the antecedent true can be extended to an assignment (new state) with domain {x, y, u, v} that makes the consequent true.
Further, we know that the packages are stored in different ways and reconstituted in complex ways of generating manifold opportunities for innovation and consequent selection, making the measurement of cultural transmission even more difficult.
In other words, familiarity requires that a donkey that makes the CDQ-containing consequent true in s2 also be present in s1.
The further aggravating factor for Latinos is that, in addition to living in heavily polluted areas, a lack of adequate insurance coverage, high unemployment and a high number of workers working outdoors make the health and consequent cost impacts even more severe.
This literally colours the clinical picture, because the patient appears cyanotic; and methaemoglobinaemia makes the tissue hypoxia consequent on anaemia more severe, because methaemoglobin does not carry oxygen.
They tend to make the affirmation of the consequent inference (B therefore A), whenever they keep in mind the initial possibility and fail to think of other true possibilities, e.g., not-A and B. They make the denial of the antecedent inference (not-A therefore not-B) when they have thought about some of the alternative possibilities (not-A and not-B) but not others (not-A and B).
In the latter case, CDQ claims the effect of familiarity is to make the cdq 'it' in the consequent of donkey conditionals quantify over donkeys in the minimal situations introduced by the antecedents of the conditionals (in the case of (13), situations consisting of Sarah and a single donkey she owns).
