Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(1)
Previous analyses have indicated that CRC screening is likely highly cost-effective, 11, 32 and may even be cost-saving, 33 making increasing screening not only desirable from a perspective of cancer control but also from a financial perspective.
Similar(59)
3 Screening programmes in the developed world have made strides in increasing screening uptake 4 and recent advances such as high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) DNA testing have improved screening among the most difficult-to-reach women.
This is perhaps a small detail but one that will definitely improve the experience by increasing screen visibility and just make it look a lot more slick.
Beating Bowel Cancer urged more people to come forward, and Public Health England to make it a priority to increase screening rates.
The increasing screen resolution is a double edged sword however.
Asking women who intend to undergo screening to make an action plan does not increase screening uptake.
Increasingly, diagnoses are being made in persons without symptoms as a result of increased screening.
The purpose of this article is to review recent research on patterns of screening, perceptions of CRC screening methods and outcomes of seven intervention trials specifically designed to increase screening among African Americans in light of the recommendation of the American College of Gastroenterologists to make colonoscopy the screening method of choice for this population.
Five years ago, a high resolution display provided increased screen real estate by making everything tiny.
The increased screen size is welcome, making everything just a little less cramped.
Although progress has been made since 1987 in increasing mammography screening among low-income and uninsured women, the increases for low-income women are less than those for higher-income women, and screening among the uninsured lags far behind screening among women with private or public health insurance [ 5].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com