Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "making doubtful the" is not grammatically correct and is not commonly used in written English.
It is possible to use this phrase in certain contexts, but it would be more natural to rephrase it in a different way. Here is an example of how it could be used: Incorrect: Making doubtful the results of the experiment. Correct: Casting doubt on the results of the experiment.
Exact(1)
These basal social, political, cultural, economic etc. differences are making doubtful the relevance and adaptability of the century-old ideas.
Similar(57)
I fully expected first my agent and then my publisher to make doubtful noises and ask if I would consider writing out the talking dog.
He emotes his way through every match, growling to himself, glaring and muttering at linesmen who make doubtful calls, ignoring applause.
She giggles to herself when she muffs a shot, never glares at linesmen who make doubtful calls, looks apologetic when she belts an unreturnable ball at her opponent.
That's good news, but not for Oregon, as such an outcome makes it doubtful the state will receive anything near the full purchase price it paid, according to sources I spoke with who are familiar with the pharmaceutical returns industry.
The problem is that the variant at codon 2 is not present in all the BAK2 sequences of reference found in the NCBI databank (Fig. 2), which makes very doubtful the validity of the reference sequence for BAK2 and thus the demonstration of Gottlieb et al. [ 2009, 2010].
Design and adherence to the protocol were described inadequately making it doubtful whether the study was implemented in a traceable way.
BENGAL COULD MISS OPENER Cincinnati receiver Andrew Hawkins will wear a cast for 10 days to try to heal his sprained left ankle, making him doubtful for the season opener.
Also, while Osterix appears not to be expressed in lateral plate derived cells (but very few cells are shown), the co-expression with Wnt1 labeled neural crest is partial and doubtful, making the main conclusion of the whole work particularly weak.
However, lateralization is doubtful, making the pathophysiological implications unclear and the final verisimilitude is +0.75.
Whether they can do as well in Congress in two years' time is doubtful, making this the last big chance.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com