Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(5)
One of the methodological limitations of the studies identified in this review is the different types of economic models used, making comparability across results difficult: none of the studies compared alternative models to answer the same question.
Even if most studies did provide a detailed description of the costs of the intervention programme in their country currency, data on the underlying quantities of resources used, discounting/inflation methods and the price year were often not displayed, thus making comparability difficult.
Laboratory-dependent confounding factors include differences in sample processing and data analyses, making comparability of data difficult.
Study populations were heterogeneous, as were study designs, data collection methods, and outcomes, making comparability across studies difficult and generalizability of findings limited.
Additionally, not all policies and outcomes of interest were collected through standardized, country-level sources, making comparability more challenging for some indicators.
Similar(55)
To make comparability across the groups possible, all interactions were reduced to 30 minutes.
At the local level risk models and hazard datasets lack spatial detail required to capture the underlying drivers, and loss data lack good geospatial referencing, which makes comparability and analysis difficult over time and space (Cutter and Gall 2015).
Therefore, to make comparability possible between potential of these task types in language engagement reported in the literature and their potential in task engagement investigated in this research, the same tasks were selected to be included in the present study.
These contextual differences often make comparability of voucher costs across countries difficult to achieve.
This lack of clarity might explain the variability of interventions across the trials that made comparability of interventions difficult.
For instance, sample size estimation, age group of the study participants, and inclusion and exclusion criteria, differed considerably between studies, which makes comparability difficult.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com