Suggestions(5)
Exact(5)
Logic models have the potential to make systematic reviews "more transparent and more cogent" to decision-makers [ 7].
Lavis J, Davies H, Gruen R, et al. Working within and beyond the Cochrane Collaboration to make systematic reviews more useful to healthcare managers and policy makers.
Better conducted and reported studies of harms are certainly needed; and improvements will help to make systematic reviews of harms more accurate.
One solution lies in advancements in methodology to make systematic reviews more efficient, such as automating aspects of the review or providing authors with specialised, centralised services in literature searches, project management, and the like.
Use of guidelines for designing, executing and reporting animal experiments will also make systematic reviews and meta-analyses of publications on animal studies more feasible (Hooijmans et al., 2010a, b;).
Similar(55)
A comprehensive record of clinical trials in a machine-understandable format would make systematic review and consequently evidence-based decision making much more efficient.
Most of these problems are related to the poor design and heterogeneity of primary research, and that there are no agreed methods or quality standards for making systematic reviews in laboratory medicine.
Gruen R, Morris P, McDonald E, et al. Making systematic reviews more useful for policy makers.
For example, a locally known and respected public health consultant presented clear, simple rapid evidence reviews in line with guidance on making systematic reviews more accessible for commissioners [ 22, 23], but with apparently limited impact.
The GSPC describes certain items in more detail, which makes it both easier to use when designing and conducting an experiment and particularly suitable for making systematic reviews of animal studies more feasible.
In the majority of previously reported cohort studies, the differences in pre-intervention study groups contributed to the heterogeneity of the results, making the systematic reviews difficult to interpret.
More suggestions(15)
make systematic recommendations
make systematic improvements
make systematic overratings
make annual reviews
make similar reviews
make systematic calculations
make systematic errors
make systematic approaches
make systematic arguments
make systematic decisions
make systematic mistakes
make monthly reviews
make systematic changes
make informative reviews
make regulatory reviews
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com