"You could still make general".
And then there's the nagging, possibly connected, fact that we don't have a way of making General Relativity and quantum theory work together at very high energies.
As we know, the most general methods dealing with the non-autonomous dynamical systems were presented by Chepyzhov and Vishik in their work in [14], and these methods make the general theory of autonomous systems applicable, but it is unsatisfactory that it can only be used in handling the problems with translation compact symbols.
Now, how can we make a general theory that for an arbitrary number of people, an arbitrary number of goods, you can solve and figure out what's going to happen that looks very much like the example and has as a special case the example we did to begin with?
A further difficulty is that the lack of the notion of function makes the general theory of the comparison of sets by size (or indeed by order) cumbersome.
Although the potential for adaptation to atmospheric change is an interesting issue, and one that will surely be used as a model system to make advances in general theory, the main reason for our interest in phytoplankton responses to elevated CO2 is pragmatic: there is a potential carbon sink in the ocean, and we would like to be able to make predictions about it.
On this base, conjectures were made and a general theory produced, first by Poincaré and then by the American engineer-turned-mathematician Solomon Lefschetz, concerning the nature of manifolds of arbitrary dimension.
A preliminary application is made of the general theory and method proposed in the preceding companion paper (Part I [1]) to the calculation of statistical properties of the reverberation and scattered field caused by randomly moving discrete scatterers.
He had made Einstein's general theory of relativity known to the English-speaking public and in 1919 took part in an adventurous expedition to Principe, off the west coast of Africa, to measure the deflection of starlight by the sun.
