majorly flawed

USAGE SUMMARY

"Majorly flawed" is not standard in formal written English, but it can be used in informal contexts. You can use it to emphasize significant flaws in something, such as a plan or argument. Example: "The proposal was majorly flawed, leading to its rejection." Alternative expressions include "seriously flawed" and "profoundly flawed."

News & Media

Social Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Peter Martin, managing director at security firm RelianceACSN said: "It's clear the company has majorly flawed security postures, and given the sensitivity of the data the company holds this cannot be tolerated".

The Guardian - Tech

Shami Chakrabarti, director of Liberty, said: "Less than three weeks ago MPs advised 123 changes to the majorly flawed draft bill.

The Guardian

It's no secret that assuming color movies are inherently "better" than black-and-white films because of, well, color, is a majorly flawed outlook on cinema.

Vice

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Albeit flawed.

Independent

Its design is flawed.

The New York Times

Very flawed.

The New Yorker

His analogy is flawed.

The New York Times

The manuscript remained flawed.

The New Yorker

Flawed, perhaps?

The Guardian - Opinion

It is deeply flawed.

The Economist

Previous agreements were flawed.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Consider the audience's expectation for formality; while The Guardian uses it, a peer-reviewed journal might prefer "fundamentally flawed".

Common error

Avoid using "majorly flawed" in high-stakes legal or strictly academic writing, as the adverb "majorly" can undermine the perceived objectivity of your argument. In these cases, opt for "deeply flawed" or "significantly flawed".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "majorly flawed" functions as an adjectival phrase where the adverb "majorly" serves as an intensifier for the adjective "flawed". According to Ludwig, this structure is used to add significant weight to a critique, transforming a simple observation of error into a strong rhetorical statement about the scale of inadequacy.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Social Media

20%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Science

3%

Formal & Business

2%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "majorly flawed" is a potent intensifier phrase used primarily in journalistic and informal contexts to underscore the existence of significant errors. While Ludwig AI classifies its frequency as rare compared to more traditional alternatives, its presence in elite publications like The Guardian and The New York Times proves its utility in modern English for adding rhetorical punch. Writers should be mindful of its colloquial flavor and consider using "fundamentally flawed" or "deeply flawed" when a more sophisticated or academic tone is required.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

deeply flawed

Replaces the colloquial adverb with a more standard and evocative intensifier.

seriously flawed

Uses a more neutral and widely accepted adverb for professional contexts.

fundamentally flawed

Suggests the errors are at the core or base level of the subject.

highly flawed

A direct degree-based alternative that sounds slightly more formal.

profoundly flawed

Adds a level of intellectual depth and severity to the critique.

significantly flawed

Offers a measured, objective tone suitable for technical reports.

inherently flawed

Focuses on the internal nature of the flaws being part of the design.

critically flawed

Implies the errors are so severe they cause total failure.

heavily flawed

Emphasizes the quantity or weight of the errors found.

majorly faulty

Shifts the adjective to focus on functional failure rather than design.

FAQs

Is "majorly flawed" grammatically correct?

Yes, it is grammatically correct as an adverb-adjective construction, but Ludwig AI notes it is often considered informal. In formal essays, you might prefer "deeply flawed".

What can I say instead of "majorly flawed" in a business report?

In professional settings, it is better to use more neutral alternatives such as "seriously flawed", "critically deficient" or "fundamentally flawed".

Does "majorly flawed" imply the same thing as "fatally flawed"?

While both suggest significant issues, "fatally flawed" is stronger, implying the flaw is so great it makes the entire thing unusable or destined to fail.

Can "majorly flawed" be used for people?

It is typically used for abstract concepts like plans, arguments or systems. If describing a person's character, ""deeply flawed"" is the more idiomatic choice in literature and journalism.