Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The majority were mild or moderate.
Fifteen patients reported 59 treatment-emergent adverse events and the majority were mild.
Likewise, NASCET reported an overall risk of postoperative CNP of 8.6%, of which the majority were mild in severity, suggesting that CNP rates remain constant over time.
All were localized, the majority were mild to moderate in severity, did not require intervention, and lasted up to 5 days.
TEAEs reported by ≥10% of participants included decreased appetite (43.2%), decreased weight (17.0%), insomnia (16.1%), irritability (16.1%), headache (13.9%), upper abdominal pain (13.2%), and initial insomnia (11.4%); the majority were mild to moderate in severity.
TEAEs reported by ≥10% of participants included decreased appetite (47.3%), insomnia (27.1%), headache (17.1%), irritability (16.3%), upper abdominal pain (15.5%), and affect lability (10.1%); the majority were mild or moderate in intensity [ 14].
Similar(54)
The vast majority are mild, but the agency estimates there are 5,000 deaths from food-borne disease and 325,000 hospitalizations each year.
This is most probably caused by the fact that only 20 cases of aortic valve stenosis were present in our cohort, the majority being mild (n = 17) and probably only moderate to severe aortic valve stenosis will result in deficient cardiac output in demanding situations.
Six patients (31.6%) experienced adverse events during the treatment period, the majority being mild in severity.
As with TPE, the majority are mild, easily treated, and self-limited.
Adverse event incidence was generally balanced across all treatment groups, with the majority being mild to moderate in severity.
Related(17)
majority were small
majority were minor
majority were benign
most were mild
majority were middle-aged
majority were wrong
majority were willing
majority were male
majority were ultra-Orthodox
majority were e-mail
majority were teenaged
majority were appreciative
majority were black
majority were open
majority were dead
majority had mild
majority were single
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com