Sentence examples for majority of descriptions from inspiring English sources

Moreover, the majority of descriptions of amphibian glands involved in chemical courtship and mating signals lack information on the structure of the glands.

Including these, the great majority of descriptions (55/62, 89%) suggested that deterioration occurred within approximately 3 min of cementation ('shortly after' in six cases, 'during prosthesis insertion' in two cases, 'within 1 min' in three cases and 'within 2 3 min' in four cases).

The wide diversity of lineages of K. pneumoniae encountered in UVaMC is at variance with the widely held view that the spread of KPC- Kp is most often restricted to ST258 K. pneumoniae or highly related strains in the same clonal complex (2, 5, 46) and contrasts with the majority of descriptions of KPC- Kp nosocomial dissemination (8, 20, 47 – 47).

The majority of these descriptions are relevant for small molecule assessment.

The majority of participants' descriptions of students related to sharing conjectures reflect a concern that students in the class will have difficulty making sense of the conjecture that is shared.

In the data, we see that the majority of participants' descriptions of students related to working on the task can be placed into three categories: students who misuse task resources, students who would benefit from the use of additional resources, and students who might be unsuccessful in making a conjecture.

In the data, we see that the majority of participants' descriptions of students related to sharing and discussing conjectures can be placed into three categories: students who share their conjecture with the class, students who have trouble making sense of their peer's conjecture, and students who use their peers' conjectures to better understand their own conjecture.

This is relevant because the majority of epidemiological descriptions for neonatal sepsis are directed toward or limited to neonates with very low gestational age (<33 wks) or very low birth weight.

The majority of recent descriptions has relied primarily on mtDNA, using either genetic distances or fixed substitutions as criteria for species recognition or has not provided proper holotypes [e.g. [ 18- 20]].

The majority of the description of the Flunet dataset in this subsection, including Figure 4 in its entirety, is a direct reproduction from [ 24], included here to increase the readability of the paper.

Because the generic description of tuna is what customers are accustomed to, it is unlikely that the majority of the failed descriptions were motivated by outright deceit, particularly in instances when the wait-staff –not chef– were relied upon for clarification.