Sentence examples for majority of chemotherapy from inspiring English sources

In essence, both radio- and the majority of chemotherapy function by either directly or indirectly inducing DNA damage and, therefore, to a mutational change within the cancer cell that allows propagation despite compromised DNA integrity.

Unfortunately, the majority of chemotherapy, which has a substantial hydrophobic component, is usually hampered by problems such as lack of tumor selectivity, poor water solubility, uncontrollable pharmacokinetic processes, and the possible incurrence of severe side effects [1 3].

The majority of chemotherapy drugs are dosed based on body surface area (BSA).

The majority of chemotherapy regimens and trials specify doses of cytotoxic drugs normalized to body surface area.

Essentially all radiotherapy services in BC are provided by the BCCA, as well as a majority of chemotherapy services.

Fluoropyrimidines form the foundation of the vast majority of chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), and they can take the form of intravenous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; by continuous or bolus infusion) or oral formulations (capecitabine).

Great majority of common chemotherapy agents trigger tumor cell death by induction of apoptosis [ 3].

The majority of existing chemotherapy reagents function by causing damage to cells with the premise that highly dividing cancer cells are more prone to the cytotoxic effects.

At interview, the majority of the chemotherapy group reported that they had noticed changes in their memory (83%) and concentration (80%) at T2.

The majority of traditional chemotherapy agents target fast-growing tumor cells based on the notion that cancer cells are rapidly dividing and, therefore, are more sensitive to drugs that affect DNA replication.

Although the vast majority of UK chemotherapy is currently delivered in specialist, high-cost hospitals, the UK health service encourages care closer to home (Department of Health UK, 2006), offering patients greater independence, choice, control and, potentially, better value for money while recognising that the evidence base for such developments is limited (Department of Health UK, 2010).