Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

major research gap

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"major research gap" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It is typically used in academic or technical writing to describe an area or topic that has not been extensively researched or studied. It is usually used to highlight the need for further research in a specific field or to show the significance of a particular research question or topic. Example: "Despite the abundance of literature in the field, there remains a major research gap in understanding the long-term effects of climate change on marine ecosystems."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

13 human-written examples

These days, the NIH conducts research on vaginal health and on women's health in general, but there is still a major research gap.

This book addresses this major research gap.

Science & Research

Springer

This is a major research gap.

How these two processes are interlinked, how to design and implement interventions that contribute to the two processes, and how they are effectively sequenced remain a major research gap.

A major research gap in the literature is that although it has long been argued that the process of institutionalization (i.e., symbolic adoption to meet regulatory requirements) will significantly weaken the effectiveness of quality management standards in China, there is a lack of objective evidence based on longitudinal data from the country.

As such, the work addresses a major research gap identified in a recent review 6.

Science

Addiction
Show more...

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

47 human-written examples

The funding priorities are leaving major research gaps.

This paper presents the existing techniques of pyrolysis, the parameters which affect the products yield and selectivity and identify major research gaps in this technology.

Finally, we identify major research gaps with regard to radical SOIs, streamlined innovation methods, the role of SMEs in industry transformation and in sustainable supply chains, as well as a need for a stronger theoretical debate on SOIs of SMEs.

Major research gaps continue to hamper the control of dengue.

What are some of the major research gaps and needs, and how should research priorities be set?

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "major research gap", clearly define the specific area or topic where further investigation is needed to provide context for your audience.

Common error

Avoid using "major research gap" to describe minor or incremental research needs. Ensure the gap is substantial and has significant implications for the field.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "major research gap" functions as a noun phrase, typically used as a subject or object in a sentence. Its primary grammatical role is to identify and describe a significant area where research is lacking. As Ludwig AI indicates, the phrase is considered grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

85%

News & Media

9%

Academia

6%

Less common in

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "major research gap" is a grammatically sound and usable term, predominantly found within scientific and academic contexts. According to Ludwig, its main function is to pinpoint areas where further investigation is crucial. While not extremely common, the phrase is used to emphasize the significance of addressing deficiencies in current knowledge and justifying the need for new research. When employing this term, clearly defining the specific area lacking investigation is paramount. Avoiding overstatement and ensuring the gap is truly substantial will enhance the impact and credibility of your writing. Ultimately, recognizing and articulating "major research gap" effectively contribute to advancing knowledge and fostering innovation.

FAQs

How do I identify a "major research gap"?

A "major research gap" is often identified through literature reviews, expert consultations, and analyzing existing research trends to pinpoint areas that lack sufficient investigation. Consider using library databases and search for existing literature reviews to identify areas scholars have already mentioned as needing more research.

What are some alternatives to "major research gap"?

You can use alternatives like "significant knowledge void", "unexplored research avenue", or "deficient area of study" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "major research gap" in a grant proposal?

Yes, it is highly appropriate. Clearly articulating a "major research gap" is crucial for justifying the need for funding and demonstrating the potential impact of the proposed research. In such case you may want to also present potential solutions and impacts of said solutions.

What's the difference between a "research gap" and a "major research gap"?

While both terms refer to areas needing further research, a "major research gap" indicates a more substantial and impactful deficiency in the existing body of knowledge. It suggests that addressing this gap could significantly advance the field.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

81%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: