Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(60)
We found that maize pollen deposition varies within and between lakes depending on several landscape variables.
The intrinsic rate of increase (rm) was not significantly reduced when F. candida fed on Bt maize pollen but was significantly reduced when F. candida fed on non-Bt maize pollen containing E−64.
year B.P., although there is evidence of human presence on the landscape in the form of maize pollen and charcoal.
We analyze maize pollen deposition patterns in surface sediment samples from four lakes with differing morphometry and surrounding land use.
Survival, development, and the reproduction were not significantly reduced when F. candida fed on Bt maize pollen rather than on non-Bt maize pollen, but these parameters were significantly reduced when F. candida fed on non-Bt maize pollen containing the protease inhibitor E-64 at 75 μg/g pollen.
For maize pollen deposition versus distance to nearest maize field.
In fact, Bt-maize pollen deposition and maize pollen densities on leaves up to 3000 n/cm2 were detected within the protected area.
When maize plants in our field reached anthesis, maize pollen from treated seed was found to contain clothianidin and other pesticides; and honey bees in our study readily collected maize pollen.
In this study, maize pollen sampling was performed using the PMF passive aerosol sampler.
Figure 3 Maize pollen deposition versus distance to the next maize field.
The method allows accurate field identification and quantification of maize pollen on plant leaf surfaces.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com