Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(18)
The applicants of the two stacked event maize applications referred to the risk assessments submitted in the single-event applications.
Of the GM maize applications, 57% contained studies carried out by the applicant with the respective GMP under field conditions in Europe (Table 6).
However, none of these were taken into consideration in GMHT maize applications.
In this article, the most important findings regarding the evaluation of GM maize applications are presented.
The studies cited for stacked event maize applications generally dealt with the single-event GMPs.
However, protected species have not been seriously considered in any of the GM maize applications.
Similar(42)
The applications of the stacked events contained no studies with the GMPs in question and cited the studies submitted for the respective single-event IR maize application described above.
We aimed to evaluate the effects of maize straw applications on the dynamics of organic N and amino acid N derived from fertilizer N. Six treatments were set: no N fertilization (CK), application of only maize straw (M), low N levels (N1), N1 plus maize straw (N1 + M), high N levels (N2), and N2 plus maize straw (N2 + M).
In contrast, the soil N contents in the plots of maize the application of 50% Grade B + 50% JC at 2.5 t/ha had a slow but steady N supply capacity.
Intriguingly, in maize, foliar application of Azospirillum also elicited genes related to tolerance of abiotic stresses (APX1, APX2, SOD4), as well as defense genes (PR-genes), which has also been attributed to phytohormones signaling (Fukami et al. 2017).
aThree of the nine studies cited are missing in the application; breference to a single-event application of maize 1507; creference to single-event applications of maize MON810 and maize NK603; dstudy not attached to the application; ereference to published studies, no toxicological studies submitted by the applicant.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com