Sentence examples for maintained low expression from inspiring English sources

From 0 to 2 dpi, MbIGYP11, 13, 16, 20, 39, 73, and 76 maintained low expression levels without significant induction.

In contrast, Cla005425 maintained low expression throughout fruit development and ripening, decreasing further in the later stages.

Unlike miR160, miR167 and miR390 maintained low expression levels from SD8 to C5, and then increased dramatically from C5 to LD3, indicating that miR167 and miR390 may function in the auxin pathway during active growth.

Figure 5A shows that the expression level of CcGCC1 in clementine increased about 15-fold during flavedo ripening, while 39B3 mutant maintained low expression levels in November and only experienced a slight increase in January.

Cluster 2 comprises 337 genes that were suppressed immediately at stage 2 and most maintained low expression levels at stage 3. BLAST analysis indicated that these genes are involved in amino acid metabolism, development and transcription, and auxin signaling.

Lipoprotein lipase (Lpl) and Fabp3 gene expression were dramatically decreased 3 days after SCI as compared to controls and maintained low expression levels on days 8 and 14 after SCI.

In the absence of TGFβ, the cells maintain low expression levels of pro-fibrogenic genes (Fig.  3c).

We find that the cells grown in mRM maintain low expression levels of Acta2, Col1a1, and Lox, similar to uncultured D0 mouse qHSCs and have an intermediary phenotype with large intra-cytoplasmic lipid droplets (Additional file 1: Figure S6).

Incubation with proteasomal inhibitor N-[N- N-Acetyl-L-leucyl -L-leucyl]-L-norleucine (ALLN-[N- N-Acetyl-L-leucyl -L-leucyl]-L-norleucine, suggestiN-[N- N-Acetyl-L-leucyl -L-leucyl]-L-norleucine level of HMGR by proteasomal degradatioN-[N- N-Acetyl-L-leucyl -L-leucyl]-L-norleucine

Notch overexpression also maintained low Pax7 expression non-cell autonomously in untransfected cells that exited the DM.

Neurospheres and neurons obtained from FRDA iPSCs retained pathological GAA repeat expansions (Fig. 3B) and maintained low FXN mRNA expression levels, at 30 35% of controls (Fig. 3C), but showed no obvious difference in morphology, viability or differentiation potential compared with those derived from control iPSCs (Fig. 3A).