Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(1)
We used MEG data to identify the cortical networks recruited by a group of typically developing children as they maintained items in VSTM.
Similar(59)
We chose to maintain items with 100%% inter-rater agreement on the first two questions.
In the studies that showed no relation between working memory and the blink, observers were asked only to maintain items in memory for recall later, or were tested on memory capacity mostly.
Also, executive functions permit to maintain items in a fixed sequence and integrate diverse types of information (factual, temporal, spatial) into a meaningful representation [1] in order to form a comprehensive episode [58].
Healthy control participants appear to recruit different neural networks for maintaining items in verbal WM in true memory compared with false memory trials as indicated by deactivated prefrontal regions in true memory.
Another reason to maintain items was to create a sense of concordance with the respondent by ensuring that items would be perceived as relevant.
Maintaining items in memory also involves persistent activity in the medial temporal lobe (MTL; e.g., Axmacher et al., 2007), as well as the parietal and frontal cortices (e.g., Curtis, 2006).
Development therefore proceeded on the assumption that linking items could be adapted to employ these response modes and still maintain item parameters from previous assessments, an assumption that was ultimately supported by the Field Test data (OECD 2013).
Discontinue rules were added to the HKECDS (Trial Version 2) to maintain item equivalence while reducing the cognitive burden for children with lower level of abilities at the same time.
14 17–21 It seems that the relatively preserved temporal lobe-related memory function in our patients with PD enabled this group to generate or maintain item-specific memory; this compensatory effect ultimately prevented this memory function from completely breaking down in these patients.
Thus there is no valid statistical reason to drop the items and we maintained both items in the scale.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com