Phases in which decisions are made are mainly when stakeholders collaborate during design meetings using collaborative tools.
The interests of existing stakeholders, mainly ranchers with grazing allotments, have been largely preserved.
Direct stakeholders mainly consist of positive stakeholders, as they are the ones concerned with the design and implementation of the project with the object of completing it within the specified parameters of time, cost and quality/performance.
Ayantunde et al. (2014) stated that stakeholders, mainly Indigenous farmers, tended to portray the transhumant practices as generally bad for community-based natural resource management (NRM).
In line with the missing causal link between CSR performance and CSR disclosure stakeholders mainly regard the latter as not trustworthy (Newell and Goldsmith 2001).
Furthermore, their seminal works argue that companies should be less responsive to secondary stakeholders mainly because they lack direct financial interaction.
Looking ahead, only few stakeholders, mainly from conservation and policy groups, expect effects of energy wood production and use on other forest ES.
Although MPAs can be created with the support of current stakeholders, mainly fishers, implementation of spatial restrictions and of no-take zones in particular, force adjustments to the existing fisheries in the area.
However, beyond evidence, all stakeholders (mainly the referring general or specialized physician and the radiologist) should support and use such guidelines; to reach this aim, a consensus-finding project must precede the publication of guidelines (e.g., using an iterative process called the "Delphi procedure").
The WSSCC, which was first established in 1990, will specifically aim to create a coalition mechanism between policy-makers and other stakeholders, mainly through advocacy.
