Sentence examples for mainly negative results from inspiring English sources

The most demanding requirement is that each agent should always have a dominant strategy, but mainly negative results are obtained in this case.

Chinese researchers who used CRISPR to experiment for the first time on a human embryo in April 2015 made their (mainly negative) results public, a decision that was described as 'ethical' and 'could reduce both risky and pointless research' (Sandberg 2015).

DJ-1 alterations are more frequent than α-syn mutations; consequently, DJ-1 has been evaluated as a genetic predisposing factor for sporadic PD though with mainly negative results [23], [24].

There were conflicting but mainly negative results regarding the influence of baseline pain severity, neurological deficit, nerve root tension signs, duration of symptoms and radiological findings on outcome.

The debate regarding safety of supplementation of immune-modulating nutrients has mainly emerged from negative results of the REDOXs [9] and OMEGA [10] trials with, respectively, 80 and 85% medical ICU patients, while in the SIGNET trial [8], showing no benefit nor harm of immune-modulating nutrients, only 25% of included patients were medical.

However, validation of the methods proposed here is required by applying them to a larger sample of individuals from different populations and geographic origins in order to avoid mainly false-negative results.

Several meta-analyses on the efficacy of TENS in painful disorders have yielded ambiguous or negative results mainly due to inadequate methodology and/or reporting [143, 145 148].

One of the major limiting factors of the present study is small sample size, which could condition false negative results (mainly the negative results in the cross sectional study) [ 24].

It was concluded that a substantial rejuvenation of the estuary was possible utilising various strategies, including creating a tidal lake, removing tidal levees, reconstituting an old meander system, and creating an additional waterway, whilst mainly negative trade-offs would result from installation of a barrage.

We experienced an overall sensitivity of 73% and specificity of 38%, the false negative results being mainly small size (<10 mm) infiltrating malignant lesions and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS).

A change of policy was shown, mainly due to the decrease of false negative results.