Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
We have added a sentence to the main text clarifying that this protocol was approved by multiple institutional review boards and is performed under an Investigational Device Exemption granted by FDA.
Similar(59)
We have rephrased the main text to clarify this point.
We added text to both the legend for Figure 7 and the main text to clarify that all strains shown in Figure 7C were in the genetic background containing only one copy of the histone H3-H4 gene pair on a plasmid.
We have now revised the main text to clarify this point (subsection headed "SWI/SNF remodeling evicts Gal4DBD from DNA"). 3) It is not clear how SWI/SNF complex can translocate past the Gal4DBD without displacing it in the absence of a nucleosome (in the first paragraph of the subsection headed "In vivo implications of SWI/SNF action in TF regulation").
Main text, fourth paragraph: clarify "unbiased approach" (at least in Methods) How many sites were used?
Main text, fourth paragraph: clarify or show data to support the claim that "shorter fragments gave the highest resolution and smallest range in peak widths"; Again this would be better supported with a comparison of both X-ChIP-seq and conventional ChIP-seq (at least by bioinformatically selecting shorter insert sizes).
Main text, first paragraph: Clarify the reasoning/evidence that this is "near base-pair resolution"?
Main text, fifth paragraph: Clarify "achieve single nucleotide resolution" and comment on offset between the two techniques.
We have included these results in the main text and Figure 3B, and clarified the details in Materials and methods under "Interaction permutation analysis".
We have revised the Figure 4, the Figure 4 legend, and the main text in an effort to clarify these points (see modifications to the second paragraph of the subsection entitled "Complex relationships between protein sequences and motifs recognized by the NHR family").
The reference to "rewarded" and "unrewarded" odor in the passive exposure context is now clarified in the main text.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com