main technical contributions

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "main technical contributions" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the key advancements or innovations that a work, project, or research has provided in a technical context. Example: "The paper outlines the main technical contributions of our research, highlighting the novel algorithms developed for data processing."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

This article has three main technical contributions.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Among the main technical contributions is a detailed comparison between relevance under implicit belief and three other approaches in the literature.

Artificial Intelligence

Our main technical contributions include: setup of a data mining based neuro-fuzzy system for modeling friction; learning algorithm for tuning the neuro-fuzzy system friction model using Lyapunov stability theory, which is associated with a compensation control scheme and guaranteed closed-loop system performance.

Expert Systems with Applications

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

The main technical contribution of this work is the introduction of a blind equalization technique based on Gaussian mixtures.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Our main technical contribution concerns the study of a representative task scheduling problem for which the standard mechanism design tools do not suffice.

Games and Economic Behavior

Our main technical contribution is to derive, within that framework, a very general parametrization for the set of multipliers corresponding to the nonstandard uncertainty regions resulting from PE identification of MIMO systems.

Automatica

The main technical contribution in this work is an extension of previous HDR reconstruction approaches for single shot HDR imaging based on local polynomial approximations (Kronander et al., Unified HDR reconstruction from raw CFA data, 2013; Hajisharif et al., HDR reconstruction for alternating gain (ISO) sensor readout, 2014).

EURASIP Journal on Image and Video Processing

"The main technical contribution of this paper is an approach for producing extremely stable videos, in which viewpoint and transient appearance changes are almost imperceptible, allowing the viewer to focus on the more salient, longer time scale scene changes," the researches explain in their project's accompanying paper, which was submitted for this year's SIGGRAPH conference.

Vice

The main technical contribution of the present work was unraveling which measurements to make on the surface of the TM to find the 3 moduli (see Fig. 1 lower row), and overcoming the essential difficulty in applying a calibrated shear force by the AFM cantilever in the surface plane of the TM.

Plosone

Our main technical contribution is a series of measures that can be used to compare and evaluate network clustering algorithms with respect to how well they perform in uncovering known, potentially overlapping functional modules.

Bioinformatics

Finally, the main technical contribution of [ 22] is a DP algorithm for computing the likelihood of a gene-tree and its edge lengths given parameters and the species-tree under the DL model.

BMC Genomics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When outlining the "main technical contributions" of a project, clearly and concisely describe each contribution, highlighting its novelty and impact on the field. Use precise language to avoid ambiguity and support each claim with evidence or examples.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the impact of the "main technical contributions". Present an honest and realistic assessment of their value and limitations. Overstating the contributions can undermine credibility.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "main technical contributions" functions as a noun phrase. It identifies the primary and significant advancements or innovative aspects within a technical domain. Ludwig AI confirms that it is usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "main technical contributions" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase, primarily employed in formal and scientific contexts to emphasize the key innovative achievements of a project or research. Ludwig AI's analysis indicates its common use in academic and technical writing. While its frequency is relatively rare, effectively communicating these contributions requires clarity and precision. When writing, focus on clearly articulating the novelty and impact, and avoid overstating the significance to maintain credibility. Alternative phrases such as "key technological advances" or "major technical innovations" can be used depending on the context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

major technical innovations

Stresses the novelty and innovative aspects of the technical contributions.

core technological developments

Highlights the central and essential nature of the technical developments.

key technological advances

Focuses on the advancements themselves, rather than the contributions.

fundamental algorithmic contributions

Highlights contributions specifically related to algorithms.

primary engineering achievements

Highlights the engineering aspect and the successful outcomes.

significant scientific breakthroughs

Emphasizes the scientific impact and innovative nature of the contributions.

essential software advancements

Focuses specifically on advancements in software development.

leading-edge technical progress

Emphasizes the state-of-the-art nature of the technical progress.

principal design features

Focuses on the key elements in a design context.

central mechanical improvements

Specifically addresses improvements in mechanical aspects.

FAQs

How can I effectively communicate the "main technical contributions" of my work?

Focus on clearly articulating the novelty and impact of each contribution. Use precise language, provide supporting evidence, and avoid technical jargon that may not be understood by all audiences. Visual aids, such as diagrams or charts, can also be helpful.

What are some alternatives to using the phrase "main technical contributions"?

You can use alternatives like "key technological advances", "major technical innovations", or "significant scientific breakthroughs" depending on the specific context.

How do "main technical contributions" differ from general project outcomes?

"Main technical contributions" specifically refer to the novel and innovative aspects of a project that advance the field, while general project outcomes encompass all results and deliverables, including those that may not be groundbreaking.

In a research paper, where should I highlight the "main technical contributions"?

The "main technical contributions" should be clearly stated in the introduction and abstract. They should also be elaborated upon in the methodology and results sections, with a summary in the conclusion.