main technical contribution

USAGE SUMMARY

'main technical contribution' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to a significant technical achievement or innovation. For example: "His main technical contribution was the development of a sophisticated algorithm for predicting stock market trends."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

7 human-written examples

Our main technical contribution concerns the study of a representative task scheduling problem for which the standard mechanism design tools do not suffice.

Games and Economic Behavior

Our main technical contribution, which may be of independent interest, relates the total variation distance between the leaf state distributions of two trees with a notion of combinatorial distance between the trees.

Princeton University

Our main technical contribution is to derive, within that framework, a very general parametrization for the set of multipliers corresponding to the nonstandard uncertainty regions resulting from PE identification of MIMO systems.

Automatica

The main technical contribution of this work is the introduction of a blind equalization technique based on Gaussian mixtures.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

The main technical contribution of the present work was unraveling which measurements to make on the surface of the TM to find the 3 moduli (see Fig. 1 lower row), and overcoming the essential difficulty in applying a calibrated shear force by the AFM cantilever in the surface plane of the TM.

Plosone

Our main technical contribution is a series of measures that can be used to compare and evaluate network clustering algorithms with respect to how well they perform in uncovering known, potentially overlapping functional modules.

Bioinformatics

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

53 human-written examples

Among the main technical contributions is a detailed comparison between relevance under implicit belief and three other approaches in the literature.

Artificial Intelligence

Our main technical contributions include: setup of a data mining based neuro-fuzzy system for modeling friction; learning algorithm for tuning the neuro-fuzzy system friction model using Lyapunov stability theory, which is associated with a compensation control scheme and guaranteed closed-loop system performance.

Expert Systems with Applications

This article has three main technical contributions.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

This section is our main technical part.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The main technical goal of the MindView project and, thus, the subject of this contribution, is achieving simultaneous PET/MR imaging, dedicated to brain examination in clinical research settings to study psychiatric disorders.

EJNMMI Physics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research or projects, clearly define the "main technical contribution" early on to set expectations and highlight the core innovation.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the "main technical contribution". Ensure that the claimed contribution is genuinely novel and impactful, supported by evidence and analysis.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "main technical contribution" functions as a noun phrase, identifying a significant element within a technical context. Ludwig AI indicates that this phrase is grammatically correct and appropriate for formal and technical writing.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

43%

Academia

29%

News & Media

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "main technical contribution" is a noun phrase used to emphasize the core technical advancement within a particular work. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and its suitability for formal contexts such as academic publications and scientific reports. When using this phrase, it's crucial to clearly articulate the novel aspects of the work and to avoid overstating its impact. Alternatives like "key technical advancement" or "primary technical achievement" can be used depending on the specific nuance you want to convey. Its primary function is to highlight and define the most important technical advancement, innovation, or input within scientific and academic spheres.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

primary technical achievement

Replaces "contribution" with "achievement", focusing on the accomplishment aspect.

key technical advancement

Substitutes "main" with "key" and "contribution" with "advancement", emphasizing progress.

principal technical input

Uses "input" instead of "contribution", highlighting the element provided.

major technical innovation

Replaces "contribution" with "innovation", stressing the novelty of the element.

central technical development

Focuses on the "development" aspect, emphasizing the process.

significant technical advancement

Uses "significant" instead of "main", highlighting the importance of the progress.

chief technical offering

Replaces "contribution" with "offering", referring to something provided or presented.

leading technical addition

Focuses on the element of "addition", referring to something added to the field.

core technical asset

Uses "asset" instead of "contribution", emphasizing the valuable aspect.

essential technical element

Replaces "contribution" with "element", referring to a necessary part.

FAQs

How can I identify the "main technical contribution" in my research?

The "main technical contribution" is the novel and significant advancement your work brings to the field. It's what sets your research apart and provides a new solution, method, or insight. Consider what problem your work uniquely addresses or how it improves upon existing approaches.

What are some alternatives to saying "main technical contribution"?

You can use alternatives like "primary technical achievement", "key technical advancement", or "principal technical input" depending on the context.

How does the "main technical contribution" differ from related work?

The "main technical contribution" represents the specific advance made beyond existing research. Related work provides context and background, while the contribution highlights the unique value and novelty of your own work.

Why is it important to clearly state the "main technical contribution" in a paper?

Clearly stating the "main technical contribution" helps readers quickly understand the significance and novelty of your work. It provides a focal point for evaluating your research and distinguishes it from existing literature, making the impact more apparent.