Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
We included all black (N = 143) or white (N = 313) patients from the main study database for whom complete survey, laboratory, coronary angiographic, and ventriculographic data were available.
The data are collected by the project manager and merged with the main study database.
The main study database uses research electronic data capture (REDCap) software that simultaneously receives data from multiple computers[ 55].
By collecting baseline survey data into a handheld recorder, transcribing errors are avoided by then downloading data directly into the main study database.
Participant responses were recorded by the interviewer onto an optically scan-able form that was scanned following administration, so that data were immediately available in the main study database.
Participant study number, entries for all scheduled appointments during 2003, and the date(s) on which the participant arrived for these appointments were extracted from the main study database.
Similar(54)
The respondents in the main study were selected from a database with names and addresses of all GP members of the Norwegian Medical Association and matched with vendor lists of GPs using specific EPR systems.
Socio-demographic characteristics were extracted from the database of the main study[ 4- 6].
The main study limitations were related to the type of databases used.
During the main study period (fiscal years 2003-6), we identified 6 867 768 patients from the diagnosis database.
The study database was developed based on few comprehensive databases covering numerous cities over 4 decades.
Related(20)
main trial database
main study dataset
primary study database
main study results
main searchable database
main study group
main target database
main study publication
main secret database
main supporter database
main library database
main memory database
main register database
main registry database
main Reactome database
main study design
main participant database
main study population
main plant database
main map database
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com