Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(7)
In Section 3, we sate our main result with its proof.
For comparing our main result with Theorem 1.1, we present the following assumed conditions and our main result.
For example, when the press release did not quantify the main result with absolute risks, 9% of the 168 newspaper stories provided these numbers.
The only measure for which the absolute effect of the abstract was greater than that of the press release was for quantifying the main result (although press releases were substantially more influential for quantifying the main result with absolute risks).
However, significantly more abstracts than press releases quantified the main result with absolute risks (50% v 34%, P=0.04) and mentioned any research limitations (71% v 40%, P=0.004).
9% of stories quantified the main result with absolute risks when this information was not in the press release, 53% did so when it was in the press release (relative risk 6.0, 95% confidence interval 2.3 to 15.4), and 20% when no press release was issued (2.2, 0.83 to 6.1).
Similar(53)
In addition, we illustrate our main results with three examples.
We also illustrate our main results with several examples.
In Section 3, we provide our main results with related proofs deferred to Section 4.
In this section, we present our main results with respect to BVP (1.4).
The overview gives an ordered account of the main results, with the corresponding references.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com