Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(3)
Exact(6)
Relative growth rate (RGR) was greatly reduced by drought condition (Table 1, main effect treatment), but similar between the genotypes (main effect genotype).
The drought-exposed plants also had greater relative biomass allocation to roots compared to the WW plants (Fig. 1n; Table 1, main effect treatment).
Leaf temperature and relative water content (RWC) varied between growth conditions, but were similar between genotypes (Fig. 1p, q; Table 1, main effect treatment and genotype).
The drought-induced reduction in RGR was accomplished by corresponding reductions in leaf area ratio (LAR), specific leaf area (SLA) and biomass productivity per unit leaf area (LAP) (Eqn. 1 & 2) (Table 1, main effect treatment).
Thus, at the end of the experiment, total number of leaves and total N accumulation in leaves, which is a main driver for growth, were greatly reduced by drought (Fig. 1b; Table 1, main effect treatment).
Plants grown in WW conditions were both taller (mean (± standard deviation (SD)) 135.5 ± 6.4 cm), had more sylleptic shoots and greater total root, shoot and leaf biomasses compared to the drought stressed plants (height mean 84.3 ± 10.5 cm; Fig. 1a, d, e, i, m; Table 1, main effect treatment).
Similar(54)
The model that best fit the data took into account the main effects treatment and time and their interaction with the season.
Firstly, a fixed effect model was estimated with all main effects (treatment, time) and adjusted for the background factors that differed between groups despite the randomisation.
The full model for all four cytokines has four main effects: treatment, insulin, time during stage 1 and time during stage 2. It has three interaction terms: treatment with insulin, time during stage 1 and time during stage 2, respectively.
The ANCOVA analysis showed a similar outcome, no significant treatment main effect or treatment × prepulse interaction.
As for Group A, follow-up analyses with dose-levels of each group combined were conducted for Group B, and there was no significant treatment main effect or treatment × prepulse interaction.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com