Sentence examples for main effect task from inspiring English sources

The Control task required more time than the Identity task (main effect task – F 1, 14) = 28.1, p<.01).

The TASK (Control-Identity) × EXPERTISE (Experts-Novices) ANOVA showed that both groups of players needed more time to identify geometrical shapes than chess pieces (main effect task – F 1, 14) = 53, p<.01).

Figure 2B shows that overall in all runs players tended to fixate more often on the objects of interest in the Control task than in the Identity task (main effect task – F 1, 9) = 4.6, p = .06).06

Finally, the Check task was more demanding than the Identity task as indicated by increased RTs for the Check task (main effect task – F 1, 14) = 91.7, p<.01).

The comparison between Check and Control tasks (main effect task) revealed significant activations in the areas as in the previous comparison – left lateral areas (pMTG & OTJ) and right OTJ (Figure 3B).

In the first run, that is without training on the tasks, the reaction times were increased in the Check task compared to the Identity task (main effect task – F 1, 14) = 49.5, p<.01), and experts were faster overall (main effect expertise – F 1, 14) = 6, p<.

An ANOVA of RT data with the factors task and stimulus phase revealed significant main effects (task: F1,15 = 10.23, P < 0.01; stimulus: F1,15 = 7.48, P < 0.05), reflecting slower responses for the shape task and the SI phases, respectively (Table 1).

This pattern was reliable, as confirmed by an ANOVA with the factors task (shape, alphabet), PM condition (OG, PM), and stimulus phase (SO, SI), which revealed all main effects (task: F1,15 = 12.29, P < 0.006; PM: F1,15 = 46.22, P < 0.001; stimulus: F1,15 = 47.92, P < 0.001).

For the window 200 ms before onset of the first choice stimulus, firing was significantly greater in the cued-target than the fixed-target task (ANOVA across cells with factors task × hemifield, main effect of task P < 0.001).

Finally, the main effect of task indicates that comparison tasks were associated with longer reaction times than sequencing tasks.

Across all ages, RT differed between the 3 tasks [main effect of task: F 2, 94) = 5.35, P = 0.006]; the main effect of task was due to longer RTs in the Expression task in comparison to the identity task [ t(47) = 3.28, P = 0.002].