Sentence examples for main effect population from inspiring English sources

Postnatal cues did not alter the overall features of co-cultured E17 AR PCs, which remained clearly distinct from their P0 counterparts (Figure 6A D; growth rate, tree, tree ratio, E17+P0 vs P0, main effect population always P<0.05; E17+P0 vs E17 main effect population always P>0.05).

On their hand, embryonic EL axons extended according to a slower but more constant pace throughout the whole period (Figure 5A; main effect population F1,269 = 4.81 P = 0.03), and eventually developed longer stem neurites than their postnatal counterparts (Figure 5B; Student's t test, P<0.05, comparison between E17 PCs at 14 DIV and P0 PCs at 7 DIV).

Furthermore, although the overall growth speed of EL axons of both ages was slower than that of AR axons (Figure 5A; main effect population F1,546 = 148.53 P<0.001), the elongation of the stem neurite in AR cells proceeded more slowly than that of EL PCs (compare Figure 5A and F; main effect of population F1, 504 = 61.79 P<0.001).

A large number of genes were differentially expressed between populations consistently in both sexes, regardless of EMB presence (main effect population; Table 5).

p-glycoprotein was not significantly affected by EMB dose (main effect or interaction; P > 0.1), but had higher expression in males than females (P < 0.0001), and higher expression in the resistant population in both sexes (main effect population P < 0.005; Fig. 3D), but no significant sex by population interaction effect.

Probes with a significant main effect of population were fold-change-filtered between resistant and sensitive populations (FC ≥ 1.5).

Stem neurites grew about 2 4 times slower than trees (main effect of population F1, 494 = 273,83 P<0.001), with no differences between embryonic and postnatal cells (main effect of population F1,249 = 2.90 P = 0.09).

On the other hand, PCs of both ages displayed similar absolute lengths of the stem axon (main effect of population F1,668 = 0.47, P = 0.49).

No main effect of population size was detected, but the total number of mounts was significantly lower for coevolved males than for control males ('treatment' in Table 1).

Initially, population was included as a fixed factor, however, because of significant interactions of main effects with population, the two populations were analyzed separately.

The anova on the EC50 values calculated from concentration response curves estimated for each clonal isolate of the different treatments and populations separately, yielded results in line with the GLiM analysis, with significant main effects of population (reflecting genetic differences among the populations) and selection history (reflecting evolutionary potential).