There was also a main effect of Orientation (F (1,12) = 5.056; p<.05), with higher activity upon inverted than upright faces.
A significant main effect of orientation on feasibility level (F 1,20) = 34.1, p<.001) and on response time (F 1,20) = 47.1, p<.001) was revealed.
As shown in Figure 2 and Table 3, a memory (successful/unsuccessful)×orientation (internal/external) repeated measures ANOVA indicated that the DMN regions, except for HF and mPFC, all showed a significant main effect of orientation, reflecting higher overall activity for Int-Enc than Ext-Enc.
No main effect of orientation or grouping cues was present (both ps >.6).
Again, analysis of main effects revealed no main effect of orientation validity, F 1, 25) =.693, p =.413, η =.027, nor did this main effect interact with OSPAN, F 1, 25) = 2.162, p =.154, η =.08.
The blade flapping and the related drag are mentioned as the main effects introducing orientation data into the values provided by an accelerometer.
The main effects of orientation (F = 44.88, p<0.0001) and color (F = 24.58, p = 0.002) were significant, confirming the results from Kim & Cave, and replicating the goal-directed salience effect we found in the feature visual search task (Experiment 1): letters displayed in items with the same color, or the same orientation as the target, were better detected.
5 A similar ANOVA performed on response times revealed main effects of orientation, F 1, 54) = 6.08, p =.017, and congruency, F 1, 54) = 13.7, p <.0005, with faster response times for upright than for inverted and for congruent than for incongruent trials.
Neither the main effect of cladogram orientation nor the biology background by orientation interaction were significant: F 1, 108) = 0.01, p > 0.90,, and F 1, 108) = 0.27, p > 0.60,, respectively.
Neither the main effect of cladogram orientation nor the biology background by orientation interaction were significant F 1, 108) = 0.76, p > 0.35,, and F 1, 108) = 0.05, p > 0.80, ( eta_{mathrm{p}}^2 = 0.00 ), respectively.
