Sentence examples for main effect comparison from inspiring English sources

We propose a sample size of 600 per group (1200 per main effect comparison), which will provide 86% power to find a 5% increase in the success rate (23%) in the IC and CP conditions.

When examining the main effect comparison of Description-A versus Description-B on EQ-VAS scores after each set of descriptors, this experiment had 90% power to detect a conservative between-groups difference in VAS of 3 points assuming a standard deviation of 17.5 using total sample size of 150 and a two tailed alpha of 0.05.

A total sample size of 2400 across the 6 groups (i.e., with 800 per main effect comparison, with 800 in the XP and XC conditions combined) provides 68% power to find a 5% increase in the success rate in the IC and CP conditions.

In the analysis of simple main effects, comparisons among groups at a specific time point were performed.

When the overall model indicated significance, we conducted post hoc pair-wise comparisons with Tukey's HSD (honest significant difference) test for main effects comparisons (Siegel 1956; Steele and Torrie 1980).

Simple-main effect comparisons were also performed using the JRFit model to estimate significant difference between the positive and negative phase baseflows of PDO, AMO and NAO associated with El Niño or La Niña phases.

Post Hoc analysis and main-effect comparisons were adjusted using the Bonferroni correction.

All main effect group comparisons in conventional bands had small effect sizes.

In case of a significant main effect, pairwise comparisons with Bonferroni correction were applied to locate differences between treatments.

The YP group demonstrated the largest variability across the nine phases, as evidenced by the higher effect size value of ηp=.95 for the yoga group in the group within phase simple main effect, by comparisons with a figure of ηp = .90 for the NY group and.80 for the MS group.

In a similar comparison between these ROI-pairs, the main effect for the comparison between propranolol and placebo (mean r = 0.344; SE = 0.11) did not reach significance (Fig.  3), and no main effect for ROI pair or interaction effect was found for this comparison.