Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

main contributor to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'main contributor to' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to an individual, group or event that was a significant cause or influence in producing a particular result. For example: "The main contributor to the company's success was its innovative approach to marketing."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The main contributor to more troops in Afghanistan was France.

News & Media

The New York Times

I'm Pete, and I'm the main contributor to PeteHatesMusic.

Myocardial infarction is the main contributor to heart failure.

It agreed, too, to shift away from burning fossil fuels, the main contributor to global warming.

News & Media

The Guardian

Sulfur dioxide is the main contributor to acid rain and fine particulate pollution.

News & Media

The New York Times

The main contributor to the problem is that some masts have been converted for 4G signals.

VOCs are also a main contributor to smog, which is comprised largely of ground-level ozone.

Until recently, icebergs discharged from glaciers were Greenland's main contributor to sea-level rise.

That sounds good, since carbon is the main contributor to climate change.

The crystallographic texture was then considered to be the main contributor to the overall anisotropy.

Buildings are a main contributor to energy consumption and carbon emissions.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "main contributor to", ensure that you can substantiate the claim with evidence or data. It indicates a significant cause-and-effect relationship, so accuracy is crucial.

Common error

Avoid using "main contributor to" when the element in question is just one of many factors with similar impact. Reserve the phrase for cases where the influence is clearly dominant.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "main contributor to" functions as a modifier phrase, typically used to identify the primary factor or cause responsible for a particular outcome or situation. According to Ludwig AI, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

42%

News & Media

33%

Academia

14%

Less common in

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

3%

Reference

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "main contributor to" is a grammatically correct and frequently used expression to denote the most significant factor influencing an outcome. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is widely accepted. It is most commonly found in scientific, news, and academic contexts. While authoritative, be careful not to overstate the impact of a factor when using this phrase, reserving it for scenarios where the influence is clearly dominant. Consider using alternatives like "primary factor in" or "key driver of" depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey.

FAQs

How can I use "main contributor to" in a sentence?

Use "main contributor to" to highlight the primary factor that causes or influences a specific outcome. For example, "Increased screen time is the main contributor to eye strain".

What is a good alternative to "main contributor to"?

Depending on the context, you could use phrases like "primary factor in", "key driver of", or "leading cause of".

Is it more appropriate to say "main contributor of" or "main contributor to"?

"Main contributor to" is the correct and more commonly used phrase. It establishes a relationship or effect on something, while "main contributor of" is grammatically incorrect.

How do I determine if something is truly the "main contributor to" an outcome?

Assess the relative impact of different factors. If one factor consistently and significantly outweighs others in causing the outcome, it can be considered the "main contributor to".

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: