main contributor

USAGE SUMMARY

"main contributor" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you are referring to a person or thing that has made a significant contribution to a project. For example: "The main contributor to the success of the project was John."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

He's a main contributor.

The New York Times - Sports

The main contributor to more troops in Afghanistan was France.

The New York Times

I'm Pete, and I'm the main contributor to PeteHatesMusic.

The Guardian - Music

I am the site's editor and main contributor.

The Guardian - Opinion

Germany has been the main contributor followed by France.

The Guardian

The main contributor was old-fashioned mail delivery.

The Economist

Its main contributor has been the batsman Mahela Jayawardene.

The New York Times - Sports

Myocardial infarction is the main contributor to heart failure.

Biomaterials

It agreed, too, to shift away from burning fossil fuels, the main contributor to global warming.

The Guardian

Sulfur dioxide is the main contributor to acid rain and fine particulate pollution.

The New York Times

The main contributor to the problem is that some masts have been converted for 4G signals.

The Guardian - Tech

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "main contributor" to accurately highlight the primary source or influence behind a project, event, or outcome. It clearly indicates the most significant factor involved.

Common error

Avoid using "main contributor" repeatedly in close proximity within your writing. Vary your language by using synonyms like "key contributor" or "primary driver" to maintain reader engagement and prevent redundancy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "main contributor" functions as a noun phrase that typically acts as a subject complement or appositive. It identifies the primary source, person, or element that has significantly contributed to something. As stated by Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

39%

News & Media

33%

Formal & Business

28%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "main contributor" is a grammatically correct and widely used phrase to identify the primary source or influence behind an event or outcome. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is usable in written English and suitable across a variety of contexts. Its neutral register and frequent usage in science, news media, and business communications make it a valuable term. When seeking alternatives, consider options like "key contributor" or "primary driver" to add variety to your writing while maintaining clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

key contributor

Emphasizes importance but may not necessarily mean the most important.

principal source

Indicates the origin or starting point.

major influence

Highlights the impact one has.

primary driver

Focuses on the cause or force behind something.

leading factor

Highlights the most important element among several.

foremost cause

Emphasizes the reason or origin.

chief instigator

Suggests initiation or starting of something.

prime mover

Implies initiating force behind actions.

central figure

Highlights someone's central role in the subject.

biggest player

Suggests prominence or activity.

FAQs

How can I use "main contributor" in a sentence?

You can use "main contributor" to identify the primary source or influence in a particular situation. For example, "Technology was the "main contributor" to the company's growth this year".

What are some alternatives to "main contributor"?

Alternatives include "key contributor", "primary driver", or "leading factor", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "the main contributor was me"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct to say "the main contributor was me". It is used to emphasize your role as the primary person responsible for a particular outcome.

What's the difference between "main contributor" and "significant contributor"?

"Main contributor" implies the single most important factor, while "significant contributor" suggests one of several important factors. The first is unique, the latter is not. It's a matter of degree.