Our results show that the EA and BFW of all three species vary significantly along the longitudinal profile, i.e., upstream-downstream exposure on the alluvial bars, as well as transversally, i.e., the main hydrological connectivity gradient from the river channel toward the floodplain.
Within functional integration, two main classes of connectivity have emerged — functional and effective connectivity.
The map illustrating the multiple-generation connectivities among the sites based on oceanographic modelling indicates three main regions of connectivity, one in the North around the Bothnian Bay, one in the East around the Gulf of Finland, and one in the West around the Kattegat/Skagerrak (Fig. 1B).
Thus, the main determinant of connectivity is the mapping of the sensory epithelium onto the surface of AI. Between layers, connectivity was not strongly predicted by STRF similarity (Fig. 10, 12), with the highest inter-laminar connection strength reaching only 0.1 (Fig. 4), though across the population data the highest strength was approximately 0.05 (Fig. 4).
In the case of the insula, several anatomical studies suggested that the main trajectory of connectivity variation would be topographically localized along the rostrocaudal anatomical axis and that the variation across connectivity patterns of different insular territories would be gradual rather than abrupt.
Besides the main aims (increase connectivity, helping economic growth, reducing regional disparities, etc).
"Two to three years ago, there was a lot of hype and noise, with the main focus on connectivity management.
Indeed, in many countries, including India, Brazil, and Indonesia, one of the main barriers to connectivity is the crippling cost of data.
One of the main barriers to connectivity in India is that the pure out-of-pocket cost of data can be crippling.
