Ai Feedback
Exact(13)
Two main comparisons were performed.
Three main comparisons were made between farms.
As a corollary, our main comparisons were confined to the pre- and post-program groups.
The main comparisons were between joint protection and no joint protection, and between hand exercises and no hand exercises.
Furthermore, our main comparisons were within individual participants before and after treatment and not with the general population.
The main comparisons were expected to be made as follows: placebo vs. GTP; placebo vs. placebo+TC; and placebo vs. GTP+TC.
Similar(47)
The approach here modelling cumulative incidence (risks) rather than person time incidence is appropriate when the numbers no longer at risk at the end of the observation period is not high (as here), when the period of observation is not highly variable (as here) and when the main comparisons are with a general population (as here).
Main comparison is made between the most accurate variable step algorithms, the MFxLMS and the CAPC-3 algorithm.
However, given that the contrast for the main comparison was between within-participant factors (i.e. synchronism: synchronous vs asynchronous; stimulus type: disgust stimulus vs clean tissue), it was more appropriate to examine Cohen's dz., rather than Cohen's d.
6 Our main comparison was any conventional treatment versus conventional treatment with additional supervised exercises.
The main comparison was between self help technology versus no treatment or delayed treatment control group.
Related(20)
primary comparisons were
main perspectives were
main contrasts were
main assessments were
main assumptions were
basic comparisons were
main dishes were
main divisions were
main interests were
main streets were
main rivals were
main avenues were
main jets were
main concerns were
main winners were
main enemies were
main competitors were
main hobbies were
main objections were
main doubts were
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com