Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(11)
The two main clusters a, b are showing a global correlation with the angle ({{upomega }}_2) while the angle ({{upomega }}_1) splits them into well correlated sub-clusters (e.g. sub-clusters d, e).
An analysis of the representative structures for the two main clusters (a) and (b) shows that the two molecules differ by the isomerization of the N-terminal peptide bond.
The two main clusters a, b are showing a global correlation with the angle ({{upomega }}_2) while the angle ({{upomega }}_1) splits them into two well correlated sub-clusters (d)–(g) respectively.
The two main clusters a, b are agglomerated according to the orientation of (hbox {H}_{1}) and the oxygen atom it is bonded to with respect to (hbox {N}_{1}) which is well described by the distance (text {D}_{text {H}}).
An correlation matrix of all metabolite concentrations was calculated based on the 283 individuals and hierarchical clustering resulted in two main clusters, A and B (Figures 1A, S1 and S2).
Unsupervised hierarchical clustering stratified ovarian carcinomas (n=68), based on their copy number changes, into two main clusters (A and B).
Similar(49)
The clustering resulted in 8 main clusters (A-H).
The clustering resulted in 11 main clusters (A-K).
From the α1-antitrypsin outlier, 68 tick serpin sequences segregated into five main clusters, A-E supported by 93, 90, 96, 88 and 93% bootstrap values (figure 5).
The resulting dendrogram could be divided in five main clusters (A-E) enriched in miRNAs predominantly expressed in retina (Cluster A; Figure 1A), RPE (Cluster B; Figure 1B), retina and lens (Cluster C; Figure 1C), lens and cornea (Cluster D; Figure 1D), and cornea and RPE (Cluster E; Figure 1E).
Hierarchical clustering analysis of the differentially expressed genes revealed 11 main clusters (A-K) of expression profiles with clusters I-J being primarily composed of genes that were down-regulated in at least one strain and clusters C, D, G and H containing genes that were up-regulated in at least one strain (Fig. 3; ~2-4 fold).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com