Suggestions(5)
Exact(6)
The main analysis considered X-bar charts with universal limits (i.e. based on the global mean and SD of either ASRM or QIDS scores) applied to non-imputed data from the short run-in period cohort.
The main analysis considered all journals in each field and a sensitivity analysis did not consider the multidisciplinary journals.
The main analysis considered the perspective of health care system.
The main analysis considered studies that compared the above regimens against 6 month isoniazid (taken as reference) for efficacy and heptotoxicity (table 3).
The main analysis considered full-time workers alone, defined as those working more than 30 hours per week, 12 while a supplementary analysis included both part-time and full-time workers.
The main analysis considered intervention costs, while cost-savings associated with changes in accommodation status and National Health Service and personal social service resource use were examined in secondary analyses.
Similar(54)
The main analysis considers control charts based on mean and standard deviation across all patients' episode-free run-in periods.
In our main analysis, we considered all types of interventions of physical activity promotion.
One, alternative PDC thresholds to those used in the main analysis were considered.
In our main analysis we considered interaction between included contact-related covariates and hand-washing in a stepwise forward manner.
For the main analysis, we considered a 60-month period comprising statin prescriptions for the 13 to 72 months prior to the index date.
More suggestions(15)
main chemical considered
main analysis investigated
main parameter considered
main continuity considered
main analysis presented
main factor considered
main solution considered
main hypothesis considered
main analysis provided
main analysis evaluated
main analysis based
main issue considered
main measurement considered
main mechanism considered
main outcome considered
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com