Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(1)
The main analyses described in this paper were conducted by using clinically defined cutpoints (4, 19, 20): <25 nmol/L, 25 <37.5 nmol/L, 37.5 <50 nmol/L, 50 <75 nmol/L, 75 <100 nmol/L, and ≥100 nmol/L.
Similar(59)
The CAbMV and PRSV sequences used for these tests were representative of those used in the main dating analyses described above, so it is of interest that all the results (Tables 3 and 4) showed the South American CAbMV lineage to be about twice as divergent as the American PRSV lineage, and hence possibly twice as old.
Similar procedures were followed in each of the analyses described in the main text.
As in the analyses described above, the main effect of frontal alpha asymmetry (β =.30, p <.05) and the interaction between drug and love withdrawal (β =.27, p <.05) were significant.
The results of the transfer test (behavioral results and new MVPA analyses described in Point 7) were moved to the main Results section.
Thus the alternative analyses described above (the one-level factor analysis and the two-level analysis on data from all 11 participants) show that the outcomes are not closely dependent on the main methods that were used.
The description below describes the main analyses of the trial that will be reported.
Outcomes, including 90 day safety and reintervention within one year following initial procedure, were assessed using the same strategy described for the main analyses.
Our main analyses will be quantitative and will describe the circumstances of the children who have been bereaved by intimate partner homicide.
Moreover, the main analyses from a regression model involving non-linear terms can be described concisely and clearly.
Protocols should explicitly describe which participants will be included in the main analyses (eg, all randomised participants, regardless of protocol adherence) and define the study group in which they will be analysed (eg, as randomised).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com