Sentence examples for magnitude interval from inspiring English sources

for every ith potential seismic source zone and mth magnitude interval.

Figure 9 The percentage of the DRE volume by magnitude interval produced globally throughout the Quaternary.

Figure 8 Regional analysis of T 50 for each magnitude interval.

The annual mean occurrence rate of earthquakes in seismotectonic province can be dedicated to each magnitude interval in the corresponding potential seismic sources, using the spatial distribution function.

Structural elements The extent and activity level of structural elements (i.e., faults, folds, magnetic lineaments, active basins, and so forth) may be used as basis to judge levels of future seismic activity for a selected magnitude interval.

Determination of potential seismic sources that includes estimation of Mmax in the potential seismic sources and evaluation of spatial distribution function for each magnitude interval in each potential seismic source.

Shi et al. (1992) introduced the concept of spatial distribution function for specified magnitude intervals to fulfill this problem, which reveals a more realistic activity rate of small and large-magnitude earthquakes in the potential seismic sources.

For three magnitude intervals we use the corresponding functions g EASTEEPAS and the rates λEEPAS of the EEPAS model in Equation 6 to obtain the rates of the new rate-based model EAST ∗EEPAS.

This is demonstrated by the calculation of the median time, T50, for eruptions within given magnitude intervals, where 50% of eruptions are older than T50T5050 ranges from 5,070 years for M4-4.9 eruptoons to 935,000 years for M≥8 eruptions.

Table 2 Relationships between MS and Mb for seismotectonic provinces Seismotectonic province Magnitude intervals Relationship Alborz-Azarbayejan-Kopeh dagh 4 < mb < 6.2 Ms = 2.01mb − 5.28 Central-East Iran 4 < mb < 6.2 Ms = 2.0mb − 5.28.

We use three nonoverlapping magnitude intervals of [4.95 5.45) in (a) and (d), [5.45 5.95) in (b) and (e), and [ 5.95;∞) in (c) and (f). Note that for (a) and (d), we use a shorter time period from January 1995 to June 2009 to eliminate aftershocks of the Landers earthquake.