Baseline imaging results revealed that both groups recruit comparable fronto-parietal brain regions when making number magnitude classifications.
Though both groups displayed high and comparable accuracy rates upon performing the rather easy experimental tasks during scanning, dyscalculic children were slower than controls upon making number magnitude classifications, which is in line with the literature [ 3, 4].
As regards the involvement of the IPS in nonsymbolic number magnitude classifications, the literature is controversial: deficient recruitment of the right IPS in developmental dyscalculia is reported by Price and colleagues [ 17], while Kucian et al. [ 14] report comparable parietal activations in children with and without dyscalculia.
We discuss differences in linguistic markedness between temporal and magnitude-related classifications in an integrative account explaining the full pattern.
Soil classification, magnitude and shape of unreduced elastic response spectra, distribution of seismic shear along the height, member ductility requirements, and behavior factor are compared.
Seismic hazard levels and performance requirements, ground type classification, magnitude and shape of elastic response spectra, seismic design force and distribution of required story shear strength, local ductility requirements, and reduction factors are compared.
Semantic classification, magnitude comparison, and morpho-lexical tasks were conducted using Presentation software version 14.5 (Neurobehavioral Systems).
Including texture metrics had both positive and negative low-magnitude effects on classification accuracy that were not consistent among scale values, algorithms or PFT classes.
On the other hand, consideration of magnitude components can increase classification accuracy as far as noise level is not extremely high as observed by the classification accuracy of CLBP _ S 8, 1 ri _ M 8, 1 ri and CLBP _ S 8, 1 riu 2 _ M 8, 1 riu 2 at noise levels of up to 15-dB SNR.
Until clinical outcome studies judge the merits of iFR as an independent diagnostic method, clinicians might prefer to maintain a higher magnitude (>90%) of classification agreement with FFR, given its established role to select lesions for revascularization.
