Magnification of small structures was often difficult and instruments were rigid and without joints.
Inset showing a high magnification of tubule structure labeled by dextran.
Figure 5b, c displays the magnifications of the structures.
Figure S3: Cross-sectional SEM images with lower magnification of 3D inverse structures.
Figure 4 shows the cross-sectional SEM images with higher magnification of 3D inverse structures (Fig. 3d f).
When it comes to the validity and reliability of cephalometric analysis, several errors should be considered: landmark identification, tracing and measuring, and magnification of certain anatomical structures.
We reconstruct images from the mid-body section of zebrafish embryo at 48 hpf at d = 0.03 m with calibrated magnification of 97.05, showing structures of somites and notochord (Fig. 6(g)).
The images of zebrafish embryos at 12 hpf (Fig. 6(b)) and 17 hpf (Fig. 6(c)) are reconstructed at d = 0.04 m with calibrated magnification of 26.00, showing structures of the eye at the head region, somites in the body and morphology of the tail region.
The insets in (a) and (d) show a magnification of the mesoscopic structure.
Examination of EDCs within explant tissue at higher magnification revealed structures suggestive of active phagocytosis of mitochondria (Figure 7a, black arrows) and of sarcomeres (Figure 7b, red arrows).
